Lamontae J. White v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that at the pleading stage, “[a]ll factual allegations are accepted as true, and all reasonable inferences must be drawn in favor of the plaintiff”
• holding that a “passing reference” to an issue “[w]ithout meaningful briefing” 10 waives it
• holding that at the pleading stage, “[a]ll factual allegations are accepted as true, and all reasonable inferences must be drawn in favor of the plaintiff” (citing Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009))
• stating that the 4 McDonnell Douglas framework is an “evidentiary standard” and is not the appropriate 5 standard at the pleading stage
• finding that the students “received ‘the hallmarks of procedural due process’: notice and a meaningful opportunity to be heard.”
• holding, in a gender discrimination action, that recitation of events without 18 providing any plausible link connecting the events to the claimant’s gender “[was] not 19 cured by labels and conclusory statements”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).