· 7/1/1874
Lamont v. Solano Cty.
Citations
- 49 Cal. 158
Syllabus
<p>Compensation of Attorney.—The compensation of an attorney for services rendered by him pursuant to appointment by the Court in defense of a pauper prisoner, is not a charge against the county.</p> <p>Attorney’s Expenditures.—An attorney defending a pauper prisoner by appointment of Court, cannot recover against the county for moneys expended by him in conducting the defense.</p>
Judges: Wallace
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.