Skip to main content
· 4/21/1999

LaMonica v. State

Citations

  • 732 So. 2d 1175
  • 1999 WL 235972

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding defendant merited a hearing because his attorney possibly misadvised him regarding the. collateral consequence of whether defendant would be subject to the reporting requirements of the Sexual Offender Act
  • addressing claim that counsel erroneously stated that statutory sexual offender reporting requirements did not apply

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.