· 12/21/1976
Lamoille Grain Co. v. St. Johnsbury & Lamoille County Railroad
Citations
- 369 A.2d 1389
- 135 Vt. 5
- 1976 Vt. LEXIS 594
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing “practically every contract negotiation involves parties with some bargaining disparity”
- recognizing “practically every contract negotiation involves parties with some bargaining disparity”
- noting inquiry is whether parties had “reasonable opportunity to understand the terms of the contract, or [if] the important terms [were] hidden in a maze of fine print and minimized by deceptive sales practices” (quotation omitted)
- noting inquiry is whether parties had “reasonable opportunity to understand the terms of the contract, or [if] the important terms [were] hidden in a maze of fine print and minimized by deceptive sales practices” (quotation omitted)
- language of contract sufficiently clear to show parties’ intent to hold railroad harmless for its own negligence
- public policy forbids a railroad from limiting its duty of care to the public, but this rule does not extend to the railroad’s private contractual undertakings
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Barney, Daley, Larrow, Billings, Shangraw
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.