Skip to main content
· 12/21/1976

Lamoille Grain Co. v. St. Johnsbury & Lamoille County Railroad

Citations

  • 369 A.2d 1389
  • 135 Vt. 5
  • 1976 Vt. LEXIS 594

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing “practically every contract negotiation involves parties with some bargaining disparity”
  • recognizing “practically every contract negotiation involves parties with some bargaining disparity”
  • noting inquiry is whether parties had “reasonable opportunity to understand the terms of the contract, or [if] the important terms [were] hidden in a maze of fine print and minimized by deceptive sales practices” (quotation omitted)
  • noting inquiry is whether parties had “reasonable opportunity to understand the terms of the contract, or [if] the important terms [were] hidden in a maze of fine print and minimized by deceptive sales practices” (quotation omitted)
  • language of contract sufficiently clear to show parties’ intent to hold railroad harmless for its own negligence
  • public policy forbids a railroad from limiting its duty of care to the public, but this rule does not extend to the railroad’s private contractual undertakings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barney, Daley, Larrow, Billings, Shangraw

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.