Lamm v. McTighe

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a fence built with the understanding that it would designate the boundary line was a certain line
• recognizing in boundary disputes the doctrines of adverse possession, parol agreement, estoppel in pais, location by common grantor, and mutual recognition and acquiescence
• listing boundary theories: (1) adverse possession, (2) parol agreement between adjoining landowners, (3) estoppel in pais, (4) location by common grantor, (5) mutual recognition and acquiescence
• stating the elements of a boundary line mutual recognition and acquiescence claim
• stating the elements of a boundary line mutual recognition and acquiescence claim
• line must be “certain, well defined, and in some fashion physically designated upon the ground, e.g., by monuments, roadways, fence lines, etc.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).