Lambright v. State
Citations
- 19 Ohio C.C. Dec. 93
- 9 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 151
Syllabus
<p>EVIDENCE — SLANDER.</p> <p>Cook, Burrows and Laubie, JJ.</p> <p>Evidence of Specific Act of Unciiastity Admissible in Prosecution fob Slander.</p> <p>Under Rev. Stat. 6828 (Lan. 10431), an indictment charging that the accused used, uttered and published a false and malicious slander of and concerning a female of good repute, with intent to cause it to be believed that such female was unchaste, evidence offered by the accused, of specific acts of illicit carnal intercourse on the part of the female, which came to his knowledge immediately before the speaking of the words, is admissible.</p> <p>[For other cases in point, see 5 Cyc. Dig., “Libel and Slander,’’ §§ 287-295. — Ed.]</p> <p>[Syllabus by the court.]</p>
Judges: Burrows, Cook, Laubie
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.