Lamboy-Ortiz v. Ortiz-Velez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that knowledge of plaintiffs political affiliation is an element of a section 1£|S3 political discrimination claim
• providing that circumstantial evidence may be sufficient in a political discrimination case
• noting \the general desirability and sometime necessity of affording notice and an opportunity to be heard when monetary sanctions are imposed ....\ (quotation marks omitted)
• finding sanctions inapplicable due to failure to comply with the procedures of Rule 11(c)(2), among other reasons
• citing, in dicta, a decision in which the Ninth Circuit characterized the safe harbor as “mandatory”
• noting the textual limitations of Rule 11 and concluding that the Rule \does not govern the conduct of litigation\ beyond those bounds

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).