Skip to main content
· 12/8/1989

Lamborn v. Dittmer

Citations

  • 726 F. Supp. 510
  • 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14713
  • 1989 WL 150484

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “A district judge has discretion under Rule 54(d), F. R. Civ. P., with respect to trial costs, but has no discretion with respect to appellate costs”
  • “When costs are awarded to a prevailing party on appeal, a portion of the costs is taxed in the circuit court and a portion is taxed in the district court”
  • “Recusal motions are serious matters . . . not strategic devices to judge shop.”
  • “Recusal motions are serious matters. . . not strategic devices to judge shop.”
  • noting “§ 144 clearly requires a certificate of good faith’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Robert L. Carter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.