· 10/30/1985
Lambertz v. Lambertz
Citations
- 375 N.W.2d 645
- 1985 S.D. LEXIS 368
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- though trial court was aware that husband might retire after decree issued, evidence was speculative and did not bar modification based on substantial reduction in income
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hertz
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.