Skip to main content
· 10/30/1985

Lambertz v. Lambertz

Citations

  • 375 N.W.2d 645
  • 1985 S.D. LEXIS 368

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • though trial court was aware that husband might retire after decree issued, evidence was speculative and did not bar modification based on substantial reduction in income

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hertz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.