Lambert v. State Farm

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[W]e have not held that consent-to- settle and subrogation clauses are void, but we have placed many restrictions on their enforceability.”
• a notice “must take into consideration the facts and circumstances of each individual case”
• when insured gives underinsured carrier notice of proposed settlement, and carrier then refuses to consent or pay insured amount of proposed settlement, insured can settle without prejudicing his or her right to recover against the underinsured carrier

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).