Lambert v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that the State does not have to introduce into evidence a piece of paper, which the defendant has signed or initialed, that acknowledges he has, in fact, received written notice of the probationary terms and conditions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Ryan v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2016-02-17· cited 5×
• Geeslin v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2017-11-01· cited 5×
• Cole v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2014-04-09· cited 2×
• Robison v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2013-08-28

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. McCormack
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2000-12-15· cited 35×
• Rudd v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2001-12-05· cited 22×
• Williams v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2002-12-05· cited 17×
• Neely v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 1983-03-02· cited 7×
• Patterson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2007-05-30· cited 5×