Washington Supreme Court· 12/2/1902

Lambert v. La Conner Trading & Transportation Co.

Citations

30 Wash. 346
70 P. 960
1902 Wash. LEXIS 693

Syllabus

<p>NEGLIGENCE-EVIDENCE ■ — • DECLARATIONS OE VICE PRINCIPAL-RES GESTAE.</p> <p>Declarations made regarding an accident, made immediately after its occurrence by a vice principal, who was the person through whose negligence it is charged as having occurred, are admissible in evidence as part of the res gestae (Roberts v. Port Blakely Mill Co., 30 Wash. 25, followed).</p>

Judges: Dunbar

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Walters v. Spokane International Railway Co.
Washington Supreme Court· 1910-05-06· cited 39×
Dixon v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.
Washington Supreme Court· 1905-03-04· cited 28×
Swanson v. Pacific Shipping Co.
Washington Supreme Court· 1910-09-10· cited 22×
Cook v. Stimson Mill Co.
Washington Supreme Court· 1904-09-27· cited 11×
Lambert v. LaConner Trading & Transportation Co.
Washington Supreme Court· 1905-02-20· cited 6×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Steele v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.
Washington Supreme Court· 1899-06-24· cited 40×
Jordan v. City of Seattle
Washington Supreme Court· 1901-09-05· cited 27×
Burian v. Seattle Electric Co.
Washington Supreme Court· 1901-12-14· cited 25×
Roberts v. Port Blakely Mill Co.
Washington Supreme Court· 1902-09-17· cited 22×
Clukey v. Seattle Electric Co.
Washington Supreme Court· 1901-12-24· cited 12×

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.