Skip to main content
· 12/23/1991

Lambert v. Hasson

Citations

  • 823 P.2d 167
  • 121 Idaho 133
  • 1991 Ida. App. LEXIS 258

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that permitting plaintiff to recover for both loss of earnings and loss of time would “yield a duplicative award of damages”
  • noting that jury instructions to allow recovery for both \lost time\ and \lost earnings\ could \yield a duplicative award of damages\ and that counsel had made clear that \the claim for lost time was the same thing as the claim for lost earnings.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Silak, Swanstrom, Hurlbutt, Tern

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.