Lambert v. Gallagher

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• in dicta erroneously saying all FPAA items, which included outside basis, were partnership items without considering Jade Trading II
• in dicta erroneously saying all FPAA items, which included outside basis, were partnership items without considering Jade Trading II ↩
• in dicta erroneously saying all FPAA items, which included outside basis, were partnership items without considering Jade Trading II
• in dicta erroneously saying all FPAA items, which included outside basis, were partnership items without considering Jade Trading II

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).