Lambert v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “[t]he good faith exception is not foreclosed in the context of a warrant that is void ab initio and the Court must now determine if it applies”
• Distinguishing Krueger by explaining that the Third Circuit defines prejudice more narrowly—“in the sense that it offends concepts of fundamental fairness or due process.’’
• The FBI agents “provided the magistrate with all the information she needed to satisfy [herself] of [her] jurisdiction before proceeding.”
• The FBI agents “provided the magistrate with all the information she needed to satisfy [herself] of [her] jurisdiction before proceeding.”
• “Since Werdene did not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in his IP address, the NIT cannot be considered a ‘search’ within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment ....”
• following Master and ultimately finding suppression not warranted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).