Skip to main content
· 9/12/1980

Lambert v. City of Emporia

Citations

  • 616 P.2d 1080
  • 5 Kan. App. 2d 343
  • 1980 Kan. App. LEXIS 303

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding this rule applies even though removal of the building leaves the party wall exposed or unsightly
  • using the word unsightly in reiterating the rule regarding a party wall and finding that “[t]his rule applies even though removal of the building leaves the party wall exposed to the elements or unsightly”
  • using the word unsightly in reiterating the rule regarding a party wall and finding that \[t]his rule applies even though removal of the building leaves the party wall exposed to the elements or unsightly\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Foth, Rees, Parks

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.