Skip to main content
· 8/9/2007

Lambert v. Buss

Citations

  • 498 F.3d 446
  • 2007 WL 2265143

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding the All Writs Act does not itself confer jurisdiction; it simply authorizes a federal court to issue writs in aid of jurisdiction it already has.
  • finding 26 no irreparable harm from “mere possibility” unforeseen complication will cause unnecessary 27 pain
  • to prevail on a motion for preliminary injunctive relief, the movant must demonstrate, among other requirements, that irreparable harm will result if the injunction is not granted
  • to succeed on a motion for a preliminary injunction, a plaintiff must show, among other requirements, that an irreparable harm will result if the injunction is not granted
  • in seeking a preliminary injunction, plaintiff must show (1) a likelihood of success on the merits of his case; (2) a lack of an adequate remedy at law; and (3) an irreparable harm that will result if the injunction is not granted
  • in seeking a preliminary injunction, plaintiff must show (1) a likelihood of success on the merits of his case; (2) a lack of an adequate remedy at law; and (3) an irreparable harm that will result if the injunction is not granted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Young, Ripple, Kanne, Evans

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.