Lambert v. Belknap County Convention

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that candidate for an elected office “could not have reasonably expected to keep his or her ‘application’ private”
• describing the balancing test employed to determine whether public records are exempt from disclosure because their release would constitute invasion of privacy
• describing the balancing test used to determine whether public records are exempt from disclosure because their release would constitute an invasion of privacy
• involving petition for declaratory judgment alleging violation of the Right-to- Know Law filed in superior court after county officials denied petitioners’ request for documents
• whether information is private is judged by an objective standard and not a party’s subjective expectations
• under RSA 91-A:8, II, decision whether to invalidate action is within discretion of the trial court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).