Lambeck v. Silver Hill Hosp., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• adopting this standard when faced with the answer given and an answer that one of the parties deems would be a better answer, both of which would be legally appropriate
• adopting this standard when faced with the answer given and an answer that one of the parties deems would be a better answer, both of which would be legally appropriate
• approving “the tack of simply directing the jury’s attention back to the instructions”
• declining to analyze identical issue as it had already been conclusively decided in Ivory
• victim telling defendant he could not see his son not sufficient provocation for heat of passion instruction because it occurred two days before killing
• “The hallmark of heat of passion is taking action upon impulse without reflection.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).