Lambden v. Sharp

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding circuit court's injunction interfered with \the general operations of the agency\
• noting that an injunction was a violation of due process where the court gave no notice to the Department that it would enter the injunction and it took no evidence regarding that issue
• holding trial court has no general jurisdiction to monitor and evaluate Department's functioning
• holding trial court has no general jurisdiction to monitor and evaluate Department’s functioning
• “The court cannot ‘micro manage’ a facility operated by DCF. Nor can the court order DCF to provide specific treatment or placement of a child.” (citations omitted)
• “The court cannot ‘micro manage’ a facility operated by DCF. Nor can the court order DCF to provide specific treatment or placement of a child.” (citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).