Lamb v. McDonald

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[a] plaintiff need not prove that the specific actors within an organization were aware that the plaintiff made allegations of retaliation to make out a prima facie retaliation claim” (citations omitted)
• finding ADA claim barred by sovereign immunity because “[t]he OCA is a government entity that, pursuant to sovereign immunity, is not amenable to suit”
• dismissing Section 1983 claims against OCA as barred by sovereign immunity
• “Mere temporal proximity between a plaintiffs protected activity and an adverse employment action is sufficient to create an inference of retaliation for purposes of proving a prima facie case.”
• Titles I and V of the ADA, NYSHRL, NYCHRL, and Section 1983
• “As a matter of law, a claim of color discrimination may be reasonably related to claims of race and national origin discrimination since the EEOC could be expected to have explored that possibility as part of its investigation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).