Skip to main content
· 8/15/1996

Lamb v. Manweiler

Citations

  • 923 P.2d 976
  • 129 Idaho 269
  • 1996 Ida. LEXIS 114

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the plaintiff did not dispute the proposition that actual innocence was an additional element of a criminal malpractice cause of action
  • noting that the plaintiff did not dispute the proposition that actual innocence was an additional element of a criminal malpractice cause of action
  • noting that plaintiff did not dispute that in a criminal malpractice action the plaintiff “must establish the additional element of actual innocence of the underlying criminal charges”
  • noting that plaintiff did not dispute that in a criminal malpractice action the plaintiff “must establish the additional element of actual innocence of the underlying criminal charges”
  • noting that plaintiff did not dispute that in a criminal malpractice action the plaintiff “must establish the additional element of actual innocence of the underlying criminal charges”
  • noting plaintiff did not dispute proposition that actual innocence was “additional element” of criminal malpractice cause of action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schroeder, McDevitt, Johnson, Trout, Silak

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.