· 8/15/1996
Lamb v. Manweiler
Citations
- 923 P.2d 976
- 129 Idaho 269
- 1996 Ida. LEXIS 114
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the plaintiff did not dispute the proposition that actual innocence was an additional element of a criminal malpractice cause of action
- noting that the plaintiff did not dispute the proposition that actual innocence was an additional element of a criminal malpractice cause of action
- noting that plaintiff did not dispute that in a criminal malpractice action the plaintiff “must establish the additional element of actual innocence of the underlying criminal charges”
- noting that plaintiff did not dispute that in a criminal malpractice action the plaintiff “must establish the additional element of actual innocence of the underlying criminal charges”
- noting that plaintiff did not dispute that in a criminal malpractice action the plaintiff “must establish the additional element of actual innocence of the underlying criminal charges”
- noting plaintiff did not dispute proposition that actual innocence was “additional element” of criminal malpractice cause of action
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Schroeder, McDevitt, Johnson, Trout, Silak
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.