Lamb v. Levy
Citations
- 77 Wash. 511
- 137 P. 1024
- 1914 Wash. LEXIS 934
Syllabus
<p>Fraud — Misrepresentations—Location of Property — Evidence— Sufficiency. A verdict for damages for fraud is sustained where it appears that plaintiff and defendant were friends, and plaintiff was induced to trade store fixtures and goods worth $300 for defendant’s lot, on defendant’s false representations that the lot was located close to the Tacoma tide flats, and worth $300, when in fact it was two miles from that location and of no value and plaintiff was unable to make any investigation except to inquire the value of lots in the location described.</p>
Judges: Mount
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.