Lamb v. Lamb

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the rationale behind the exception was to ensure the decedent’s donative intent was honored, and holding that the exception can apply “in a dispute between putative heirs or devisees under a will or trust”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Brunton v. Kruger
  Illinois Supreme Court· 2015-07-01· cited 64×
• Farmer City State Bank v. Guingrich
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1985-12-30· cited 52×
• Hensler v. Busey Bank
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1992-07-09· cited 32×
• In Re: Sealed Case
  D.C. Circuit· 1997-08-29· cited 30×
• In re Estate of Pawlinski
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2011-01-21· cited 16×
• Fletcher v. Superior Court
  California Court of Appeal· 1996-04-17· cited 5×
• Morrow v. Pappas
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2018-02-16· cited 5×
• Matter of Estate of Wessels
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1990-09-27· cited 4×
• Idleman v. Raymer
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1989-05-25· cited 2×
• Brunton v. Kruger
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2014-05-16· cited 2×
• Wessels v. Burros
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1990-09-27· cited 1×
• Estate of Cunningham v. Watson
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1990-12-28· cited 1×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Franciscan Sisters Health Care Corp. v. Dean
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1983-04-22· cited 153×
• People v. Adam
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1972-01-28· cited 70×
• Kolze v. Fordtran
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1952-05-22· cited 37×
• Stone v. Stone
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1950-09-21· cited 30×
• Champion v. McCarthy
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1907-06-19· cited 29×
• Wilkinson v. Service
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1911-02-25· cited 23×
• Desiderato v. Sullivan
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1980-05-27· cited 7×