Lamb v. Jordan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that evidence did not justify jury verdict in case where key witness’s story was inconsistent with complaint, did not appear credible, and was not supported by other evidence
• stating that a court may grant judgment as a matter of law only when \`reasonable minds cannot differ as to the proper outcome'\ and that when applying this standard, \the court may not weigh the evidence or judge the credibility of the witnesses\ (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).