Lamb v. JAVED

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “a litigant cannot submit to a ruling or acquiesce in the holding, and then complain of the same on appeal. He must stand his ground. Acquiescence deprives him of the right to complain further.”
• rejecting an argument that the trial court erred by failing to apply forum non conveniens factors on remand when the court made written findings considering and weighing each of the relevant factors
• the burden is on the appellant to show harm as well as error, and “error which is harmless will not be cause for reversal”
• party who acquiesces to a trial court’s ruling cannot later complain on appeal
• party who acquiesces to a trial court’s ruling cannot later complain on appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).