Skip to main content
· 3/25/2016

Lamb v. Fraternal Order of Police Lodge No. 36

Citations

  • 293 Neb. 138
  • 2016 WL 1166254

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that “[i]n exercising de novo review [the courts] afford no deference”
  • observing that “[i]In exercising de novo review [the courts] afford no deference”
  • predicting that Utah Supreme Court would recognize reverse piercing claim
  • predicting that Utah Supreme Court would recognize reverse piercing claim
  • predicting that Utah Supreme Court would recognize reverse piercing claim
  • predicting that Utah would permit reverse piercing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.