Lamb v. Equifax Services, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• implying into plan requirement of 29 U.S.C. § 1053(a) that rights vest at normal retirement age
• “ERISA itself does not contain a definition of ‘anniversary.’ This omission, in a complex statute replete with defined terms, suggests that the ordinary meaning of the word was intended”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).