Skip to main content
· 8/15/2023

Lamaute v. Steele

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “courts should scrutinize combination patent claims with a care proportioned to the difficulty and improbability of finding invention in an assembly of old elements”
  • 'an assembly of old elements,' 'unites old elements with no change in their respective functions'
  • “an assembly of old elements,” “unites old elements with no change in their respective functions”
  • “Two and two have been added together and they still make only four.”
  • “Each of the elements combined in the patent was known in the prior art.”
  • “The conjunction or concert of known elements must contribute something; only when the whole in some way exceeds the sum of its parts is the accumulation of old devices patentable.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judge Royce C. Lamberth

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.