Lamar v. State
Citations
- 64 Miss. 428
Syllabus
<p>Cbiminal Pbaotice. Instruction. Repetition allowable. Rule as to abstract and concrete. ^</p> <p>A defendant in a criminal case is entitled to an instruction asked, embodying a principle of law applied to bis theory of the facts deducible from the whole evidence, even though such principle was already before stated in the abstract by another instruction for the accused, if there be' in the evidence such basis for doubt .as to entitle the accused to have his theory considered. Aid-rige v. The State, 59 Miss, 250, cited. It is better practice to charge the law as applied to the respective theories contended for than to announce principles in the abstract.</p>
Judges: Campbell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Edwards v. StateCourt of Appeals of Mississippi· 1999-02-09· cited 10×
- Western Union Tel. Co. v. MorrisEighth Circuit· 1900-11-14· cited 8×
- Boykin v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1905-04-15· cited 7×
- Luke Construction Co. v. JerniganMississippi Supreme Court· 1965-02-22· cited 7×
- McKlemurry v. StateCourt of Appeals of Mississippi· 2006-06-27· cited 5×
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.