Lamar v. Lamar

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The former wife is also entitled to collect prejudgment interest for all arrearages from the initial date that the former husband owed unpaid child support.”
• “The former wife is ... entitled to collect prejudgment interest for all arrearages from the initial date that the former husband owed unpaid child support.”
• \The former wife is ... entitled to collect prejudgment interest for all arrearages from the initial date that the former husband owed unpaid child support.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Vitt v. Rodriguez
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-06-15· cited 6×
• T.J.D. v. A.G.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-06-11· cited 3×
• Lámar v. Lámar
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-12-22
• Tjd v. Ag
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-06-11
• Mattison v. Mattison
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-03-08

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Bowen v. Bowen
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1985-06-20· cited 319×
• Pompey v. Cochran
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-01-08· cited 55×
• Shrove v. Shrove
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-01-20· cited 39×
• Leone v. Weed
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-08-21· cited 19×
• Remington v. Remington
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-12-24· cited 14×
• Wertkin v. Wertkin
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-08-02· cited 6×
• Taylor v. Wojtusik
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-05-14· cited 2×