Lamar M. Cullom v. State of Tennessee

Syllabus

The Petitioner, Lamar M. Cullom, appeals the White County Criminal Court's denial of his petition for post-conviction relief, arguing that trial counsel provided ineffective assistance with regard to Exhibit 6, an unedited audio/video recording of the drug transaction between the Petitioner and a confidential informant that was not shown to the jury. The Petitioner specifically contends that (1) trial counsel failed to object to the prosecutor's comment that the unedited recording did not have \substance\ (2) trial counsel failed to use the unedited recording during his cross-examination of the confidential informant (3) trial counsel failed to object to the trial court's comment to the jury that the unedited recording contained just transportation, that no one was there, and that anything else on it was irrelevant (4) trial counsel failed to object to the prosecutor's comment to the jury that the trial court was correct in stating that the unedited recording contained just transportation, that no one was there, and that anything else on it was irrelevant (5) trial counsel failed to object to the trial court's ruling that the jury could not view the unedited recording and (6) the cumulative effect of trial counsel's errors prejudiced him. We affirm the denial of post-conviction relief.