Skip to main content
· 9/28/2005

Lamar Harris v. Warden, Usp Lee

Citations

  • 425 F.3d 386
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 21015
  • 2005 WL 2373932

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that subsection (e) “does not diminish the district court’s subject-matter jurisdiction”
  • observing that “ ‘life’ and ‘life plus x years’ come to the same thing”
  • observing that “ ‘life’ and ‘life plus x years’ come to the same thing”
  • observing that “ ‘life’ and ‘life plus x years’ come to the same thing”
  • observing that “ ‘life’ and ‘life plus x years’ come to the same thing”
  • the “savings clause” is not jurisdictional

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Easterbrook, Kanne, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.