Skip to main content
· 1/24/2002

LaMantia v. Redisi

Citations

  • 38 P.3d 877
  • 118 Nev. 27
  • 118 Nev. Adv. Rep. 3
  • 2002 Nev. LEXIS 3

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, on summary judgement, a plaintiff must present specific 1| facts of an ulterior purpose in the underlying lawsuit
  • holding that where the party presented only conjecture and no evidence that the opposing party actually intended to improperly use the legal process for a purpose other than to resolve the legal dispute, there was no abuse of process
  • stating that “[a] malicious prosecution claim requires that the defendant initiated, procured the institution of, or actively participated in the continuation of a criminal proceeding against the plaintiff” (citations omitted)
  • noting that lack 13 of probable cause is a necessary element of a malicious prosecution claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shearing, Maupin, Rose

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.