Skip to main content
· 3/24/1915

Lamanna v. Stevens

Citations

  • 28 Del. 402
  • 5 Boyce 402
  • 93 A. 962
  • 1915 Del. LEXIS 21

Syllabus

<p>1. Master and Servant—Injuries to Third Party—Actions—Scope of Employment—Evidence.</p> <p>To charge the owner of an automobile with a servant’s negligence in driving the machine so as to injure a third person, it must affirmatively appear that the servant was acting within the scope of his employment.</p> <p>2. Master and Servant—Injuries to Third Persons—Actions—Scope of Employment—Evidence.</p> <p>In an infant’s action fpr injuries by the negligent operation of defendant’s automobile, defendant's mere admission that he owned the automobile was insufficient to show prima facie that the driver was acting for defendant within the scope of his employment.</p>

Judges: Conrad

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.