LaManna v. GD SEARLE AND CO.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The point at which a party reasonably should have known that an injury was wrongfully caused is a question of fact, unless only one conclusion can be drawn at some particular point from undisputed facts.”
• “Plainly, suspicion is not the same as reasonably knowing.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).