Lamah v. Doherty Employment Group, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the relator’s evidentiary challenges were without support when it was “unclear what additional evidence or testimony he believes would have been necessary”
• “An employee who has completed an assignment but refuses to accept further assignments is not disqualified from unemployment benefits because the employment relationship has ended and the refusal does not constitute a quit.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).