Skip to main content
N.D. California· 5/10/2012

Lam v. General Mills, Inc.

Citations

  • 859 F. Supp. 2d 1097
  • 77 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 595
  • 2012 WL 1656731
  • 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 65815

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[U]nder 21 C.F.R. § 101.22(i), a product may be labeled as ‘fruit flavored’ or ‘naturally flavored,’ even if it does not contain fruit or natural ingredients.”
  • “The Court takes 10 judicial notice of the packaging of Fruit Roll–Ups and Fruit by the Foot, examples of 11 which were filed with the Court by General Mills.”
  • “The 26 27 28 1 Court takes judicial notice of the packaging of Fruit Roll–Ups and Fruit by the Foot, 2 examples of which were filed with the Court by General Mills.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Conti

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.