N.D. California· 5/10/2012
Lam v. General Mills, Inc.
Citations
- 859 F. Supp. 2d 1097
- 77 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 595
- 2012 WL 1656731
- 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 65815
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[U]nder 21 C.F.R. § 101.22(i), a product may be labeled as ‘fruit flavored’ or ‘naturally flavored,’ even if it does not contain fruit or natural ingredients.”
- “The Court takes 10 judicial notice of the packaging of Fruit Roll–Ups and Fruit by the Foot, examples of 11 which were filed with the Court by General Mills.”
- “The 26 27 28 1 Court takes judicial notice of the packaging of Fruit Roll–Ups and Fruit by the Foot, 2 examples of which were filed with the Court by General Mills.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Conti
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Hadley v. Kellogg Sales Co.N.D. California· 2017-03-21· cited 73×
- Viggiano v. Hansen Natural Corp.C.D. California· 2013-05-13· cited 44×
- Stack v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.M.D. North Carolina· 2013-10-21· cited 31×
- Figy v. Frito-Lay North America, Inc.N.D. California· 2014-08-12· cited 22×
- Hendricks v. Starkist Co.N.D. California· 2014-03-25· cited 21×
- Kanfer v. Pharmacare US, Inc.S.D. California· 2015-11-04· cited 13×
- In re Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Co. Mktg. & Sales Practices & Prods. Liab. Litig.D. New Mexico· 2017-12-21· cited 11×
- Sandoval v. PharmaCare US, Inc.S.D. California· 2015-09-30· cited 10×
- Gedalia v. Whole Foods Market Services, Inc.S.D. Texas· 2014-09-30· cited 5×
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court· 2009-05-18· cited 149,772×
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court· 2007-05-21· cited 146,720×
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentNinth Circuit· 1990-05-11· cited 5,771×
- Navarro v. BlockNinth Circuit· 2001-05-11· cited 2,226×
- Williams v. Gerber Products Co.Ninth Circuit· 2008-12-22· cited 582×
- Kasky v. Nike, Inc.California Supreme Court· 2003-01-10· cited 218×
- Hauter v. ZogartsCalifornia Supreme Court· 1975-04-28· cited 207×
- Michael FREEMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the TIME, INC., Magazine Company, Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesNinth Circuit· 1995-10-06· cited 197×
- Williams v. Beechnut Nutrition Corp.California Court of Appeal· 1986-09-04· cited 82×
- Holk v. Snapple Beverage Corp.Third Circuit· 2009-08-12· cited 69×
- Leoni v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court· 1985-08-22· cited 66×
- Starr v. BacaNinth Circuit· 2011-02-11· cited 57×
- Lockwood v. Conagra Foods, Inc.N.D. California· 2009-02-03· cited 29×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.