Skip to main content
· 5/23/2003

Lam v. American Express Co.

Citations

  • 265 F. Supp. 2d 225
  • 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8840
  • 2003 WL 21230323

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • determining that plaintiff could pursue his claim for fraudulent inducement for damages for the severance benefits that he waived based on defendant’s untrue representations about his employment contract, which he would be unable to recover as contract damages

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Marrero

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.