Lam Lek Chong v. United States Drug Enforcement Administration

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that in camera review is appropriate “when agency affidavits are insufficiently detailed to permit meaningful review of exemption claims”
• noting that in camera review is appropriate \when agency affidavits are insufficiently detailed to permit meaningful review of exemption claims\
• noting that in camera review is appropriate “when agency affidavits are insufficiently detailed to permit meaningful review of exemption claims”
• upholding district court’s denial of in camera review where the “District court ruled the DEA index and accompanying affidavits sufficient”
• affirming denial of in camera review where district court “ruled the DEA index and . . . affidavits sufficient”
• “Subsection (B)’s second prong is intended to reach those statutes in which Congress itself has manifested a determination that certain specified material should remain confidential.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).