Lam Chuen Ching v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that N.C. Const. art. I, § 34, prohibits the General Assembly from granting a single, named entity the exclusive right to train bail bondsmen
• holding that preliminary injunction against private company affected a substantial right
• holding that preliminary injunction against private company affected a substantial right
• stating that, “[w]hen an agency of the State that is charged with enforcing statutes chooses to appeal rulings limiting the enforcement of those statutes, the right to enforce the statute is substantial, and the rulings are immediately appealable”
• stating that, “[w]hen an agency of the State that is charged with enforcing statutes chooses to appeal rulings limiting the enforcement of those statutes, the right to enforce the statute is substantial, and the rulings are immediately appealable”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).