Skip to main content
· 6/21/1971

LaLone v. Rashid

Citations

  • 191 N.W.2d 98
  • 34 Mich. App. 193
  • 1971 Mich. App. LEXIS 1595

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reluctantly remanding for a new trial on the issue of damages because there were two bases for recovery, only one of which was subject to statutory trebling, and the general verdict provided no way to ascertain which fraction of the award was subject to that enhancement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brennan, Quinn, O'Hara

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.