Lalley v. Adam, Meldrum & Anderson Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that contact list based on, inter alia, “information that was publicly available” did not qualify as trade secret
• finding contact list prepared by former employee was “based on her knowledge of the financial services industry and on information that was publicly available” and did not support enforcement of a restrictive employment covenant
• “It is well settled that an employee’s recollection of information pertaining to the needs and habits of particular customers is not actionable.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).