Lakhany v. Khan (In Re Lakhany)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that we may affirm on any ground supported on the record
• bankruptcy courts often make 3 nondischargeability determinations via issue preclusion on facts 4 determined elsewhere
• “Nondischargeable debts are not subject to the discharge injunction.” (citing Boeing N. Am., Inc. v. Ybarra (In re Ybarra), 424 F.3d 1018, 1027 n.11 (9th Cir. 2005))
• we can ignore harmless errors and affirm on any ground supported by the record
• “It is error to circumvent the requirement of an adversary proceeding by using a ‘contested matter’ motion under Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 9014.” (quoting In re Munoz, 287 B.R. 546, 551 (9th Cir. B.A.P. 2002))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).