Lakewood v. Smith
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 2447
Syllabus
Records under seal; improper admission of evidence; ex parte protection order; civil stalking protection order; sufficiency of the evidence; R.C. 2903.214(G)(2); R.C. 2919.27(A)(2); Crim.R. 29; R.C. 149.43(A)(1)(v); Crim.R. 52(A). Affirmed. Appellant was not prejudiced by the admission of evidence from a sealed record. Trial court did not err when it denied a motion for judgment of acquittal under Crim.R. 29.
Judges: Calabrese
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
- State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court· 1991-07-31· cited 11,342×
- Schneble v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1972-03-21· cited 1,324×
- State v. MurphyOhio Supreme Court· 2001-06-06· cited 807×
- State v. Boaston (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-03-26· cited 72×
- State v. JonesOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-02-09· cited 13×
- State v. SpencerOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-12-12· cited 10×
- Cleveland v. NealOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-04-18· cited 8×
- Cleveland v. WilliamsOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-08-15· cited 7×
- Smith v. RezutekOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-11-27· cited 5×
- State v. WilsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-04-23· cited 4×
- Cleveland v. BoldenOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-05-04· cited 2×
- Smith v. NeffOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-05-15· cited 2×
- N.S. v. M.S.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2024-12-26· cited 2×
Other cases named Lakewood v. Smith
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.