Lake Street Construction, Inc. v. Lake Street Associates

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to extend Robinson 's substantial modification defense to plaintiff’s claim that a manufacturer failed to provide explicit warnings that a forklift was not to be used without the original platform
• “the adequacy of the warnings is a question of fact for the jury”
• \the adequacy of the warnings is a question of fact for the jury\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).