Lake Oswego Review, Inc. v. Steinkamp

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing increased likelihood that a restricted delivery will be delivered to the addressee
• service by mail upon an individual defendant different than the service by mail illustrated in ORCP 7 D(2)(d) held valid service
• service sufficient where summons sent with instructions for restricted delivery and summons was in fact delivered to the defendant
• “[ORCP 7 D(l)] states that the service ‘shall’ meet the federal due process standard.”
• “ORCP 7 does not require that actual notice be provided defendant by plaintiff.”
• “[W]hen a defendant actually does get notice, defects in form of summons or method of service of summons do not invalidate service. A defendant who received actual notice can hardly assert that summons was not served by a manner calculated to give notice.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).