Lake-Cook Psychologists v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• unreported 6 earnings were “proper for consideration, but hardly compel[led] the adverse credibility 7 finding”
• The existence of “affirmative evidence suggesting malingering vitiates the 13 clear and convincing standard of review”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).