Skip to main content
· 10/15/2014

Lake Charles Xxv, LLC v. United States

Citations

  • 118 Fed. Cl. 717
  • 2014 U.S. Claims LEXIS 1098
  • 2014 WL 5180797

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the contracting officer “was acting in its legitimate interest in pressuring [the contractor] to perform” and to discuss termination internally once “it became apparent that [contractor] would not meet the delivery date.”
  • finding that the contracting officer “was acting in its legitimate interest in pressuring [the contractor] to perform” and to discuss termination internally once “it became apparent that [contractor] would not meet the delivery date.”
  • “GSA’s actions in administering the contract were consistent with the contract’s requirements, which cannot be evidence of bad faith.”
  • “GSA’s actions in administering the contract were consistent with the contract’s requirements, which cannot be evidence of bad faith.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bruggink

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.