Lajoie v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• court held that allowing the jury to hear videotaped recording of defendant’s request for counsel, even though he did not have the right to counsel, was prejudicial
• court held that allowing the jury to hear videotaped recording of defendant’s request for counsel, even though he did not have the right to counsel, was prejudicial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).